Pollution
from motor transportation : we talk a lot about it, we can see
it,
we can hear it, we can smell it, we can cough it too … some
go
as far as vomiting it while some others die from it, but actually what
is it !?
.
Pollution from
motor transportation in general
Our transports
generate several different types
of pollution, which have multiple consequences on our environment and
our
quality of life. I have listed below the most critical aspects of it :
- Air
pollution of
course, it’s
the most obvious
because it can be observed with your own eyes. Stinky air and
respiratory
diseases in towns, emission of greenhouse gases and global warming for
the
whole planet … with all the unpleasant consequences this
will have for the
future generations. For more information,
click here.
- Water
pollution, with intentional and unintentional marine oil
spills.
- Noise
pollution, especially for those lucky city dwellers who live
right next to an airport.
- Esthetic
pollution, frankly, do you really enjoy the sight of a
hundred cars waiting in front of a traffic light ? Or an highway crossing right in the
middle of your garden ? ... I think we agree ...
- Nervous
pollution, with
the
unbearable stress
of the traffic jams, the irritating behavior of some other motorists,
the impossibility to get parked sometimes, the accidents, and so on ...
- Space
pollution,
- In
town, with
the congestion of the heart of the city and the obligation to
give
away always more room for roads and car parks, all this at the expense
of Humans living space ...
- Upcountry,
with the division of large natural habitats by highways and rail-lines,
provoking the extinction of big mammals and therefore reducing
the biodiversity.
- Last type
of « pollution », but
not least, it's the one that consist in using and wasting a non renewable resource.
It may come as a surprise to some, but no, given the pace at which we
are consuming it, oil cannot be considered as a renewable
energy. For
more information, click here.
Air pollution from motor transportation and global warming
Air pollution from
motor transportation comes at 80% from road vehicles (cars, motorbikes,
scooters, trucks, bus) and at 20% from airplanes … (air
pollution
from trains and boats is not significant here).

Here are the major primary
air pollutants produced by Human motor transportation :
.
- Carbon
dioxide
(CO2) :
this is the main greenhouse gas, responsible for 60% of the
actual global warming.
- Carbon
monoxide (CO) : it
is
colorless, odorless, non-irritating but it is a very poisonous gas, it prevents blood
from carrying oxygen in the body.
- Nitrogen oxides
(NOx) : especially
nitrogen dioxide are emitted from high temperature combustion. Can be
seen as the brown haze dome above or plume downwind of cities. It provokes respiratory
diseases and increases body vulnerability to the microbes. It is
responsible for about 6% of the actual global warming phenomenon.
- Ground
level ozone (O3) : formed
by NOx and VOCs pollutants together with oxygen under the sun light.
During particularly hot summers, its evacuation towards the higher
layers of the atmosphere is slowed down, thus resulting in health
hazard for the most vulnerable city dwellers. This dangerous ground
level
ozone is not the same ozone as the stratospheric ozone,
usually
called the ozone layer ; this latest ozone is a necessary vital filter
of the UV light.
- Volatile
Organic Compounds (VOC) : such
as hydrocarbon fuel vapors and solvents, they are one of the two
constituents necessary to generate ground level ozone. See above.
- Particulate
Matter
(PM) :
it
is measured as smoke and dust. PM10 is the
fraction of suspended particles 10 micrometers in diameter and smaller
that will enter the nasal cavity. PM2.5 has
a maximum particle size of 2.5 µm and will enter the
bronchus and lungs. They are mostly produced by
Diesel engines. They are responsible for multiple allergies,
respiratory problems or even cancer in some cases.
- Sulfur
dioxide (SO2) : this irritates the
respiratory system and is as well responsible for acid rains.
Transports
account for 20 to 30% of the greenhouse gases resulting from Human
activity, and it is the only source which keeps rising out of control (other sources of human produced
greenhouse gases, worldwide data : industry = 25%, housing
/ services = 22%, deforestation = 15%, agriculture = 13%).
Air
traffic statistics speak for themselves : +30% over the last 4 years
since 2002, 2.12 billions passengers in 2006 and forecasts
suggesting +5%/year until 2026, with 29,000 additional
aircrafts
in the air
(Source : Capital, No193, October 2007). On the long run, air transport
(which conveniently is not part of the Kyoto protocol) will become the
largest source of greenhouse gases in the world !
As
for cars and trucks, there were 550 millions of those vehicles
registered in 2005, and since a growth of 5%/year is
anticipated
for the next 25 years, we will reach over a billion cars in 2030
… help ...

At
least if global warming was a problem that could be quickly controlled
and solved once suitable actions would be taken, but unfortunately it
does not work this way. The main greenhouse gas responsible for
global
warming, the carbon dioxide (CO2), remains in the atmosphere for
several hundred years, which means it will impact climate long after
its emission peak ... a peak which has yet to come, and which several
analysts do not expect anytime before the very end of the XXIst century
...
And that's not all (I really hope I'm not spoiling your day, but the
situation is quite critical, and we need to talk about it).
So that's not all, because once some climate phenomenon will
be
set in motion, we will not be able to stop them until they reach the
end of it ... a very good example is the ice-cap melting on the poles.
The concept is simple : greenhouse gases warm up the atmosphere and
induce ice melting. But ice, because it's white, reflects a
lot of
sun light ; thus ice has a kind of "cooling effect" on the planet.
Greenhouse gases => global warming => more ice
melting
=> less refraction of sun light => less ice "cooling
effect"
=> global warming => more ice melting => global
warming and so
on ... until the point there will be no ice left on Earth and polar
bears will have to swim to survive !!
But
unfortunately, ice-melting and sea water rise from thermal expansion
during the next millenniums (yes, at least this long) may not actually
be the biggest threat Humanity will have to face ... currently we are
being given a go for a time of extreme climate catastrophes (floods,
storms, typhoons, etc ...) which will without doubt bring famine on a
planet with 10 billions people to nourish (10 billions people is an
optimistic forecast, supposed to be the maximum number of persons the
planet will ever have to bear by 2050) ... and when I am saying "we", I
am thinking about the next generation who will certainly blame us for
not having been more clear sighted ...
Oil depletion
In
2002, France spent 95 million tons of oil, out of which 50
millions were spent in transports ; this is more than half of the total
consumption. The world burns (there is no better word)
4 billion tons of oil per year, and
this number increases by 2% every year.
Oil
and its derivatives (coil, natural gas, tar sands, etc …)
originate from a very long sedimentation process over a period of
several hundred million years. So theoretically, oil is a renewable
resource ; however, practically it is not. By spending within 200 years
what took 100 million years to be produced, we spend this
resource
500,000 times faster than it can re-generate itself. So oil, with
certainty, will be depleted.
Specialists predict
the oil production peak will occur between 2010 (geologist opinion) and
2035 (economist opinion). The actual proven and possible oil reserves
in the world should be sufficient for another 30 years
… however the real troubles will happen much sooner, and as
soon
as production will not be able to grow as fast as the demand.
Of
course, when this happens, any "hiccup" (war in a major producing
country, strike, sabotage, downgrading of the reserves of a major
operator, etc) will generate a surge in the oil price, going from
anything from a little price increase to a major oil shock, equivalent
to that of 1979 or even greater ...
This would not be the first war which purpose is to secure resources a
country does not have at home. Remember
those two numbers : 80% of the oil is located in countries spending
only 20% of it (Persian Gulf) … and 20% of the oil
is located in countries spending 80%
of it (Western countries and Asia).
And the solution will not come from biofuels,
since given their poor productivity and the limited surface available for cultivation,
we (in France) could produce biofuels only for 40% of
our cars …
assuming we would not grow any food at all !!! This is not likely to be
the future …
Electric
cars and Hydrogen cars (fuel cell) are also false good ideas, because
those energies are not primary energies but need to be produced from
another energy source. In today's world, electricity and
hydrogen are mainly produced from fossil energy, except in
France, where nuclear energy generates 78% of the electricity. OK, so let's
imagine that we (in France) all go for electric cars, we will
then have to double our nuclear energy capacity and is it necessary to
recall that Uranium 235 reserves (only nuclear fuel right now) are
evaluated at 50 to 90 years at most ? We see it clearly, there will be
no miracle the science only can handle, consumers behaviors will have
to change. We
will have to change.
My personal impact
Out
of pure curiosity, and certainly not to give in any self-flagellation
tendency (does this make sense in English ? I really wonder !!), I
wanted to know how many tons of oil I had spent in my entire life, and
how many tons of greenhouse gases was I responsible for so far ?
So I took my calculator and got started with additions and
multiplications ... here are the results :
| means
of transportation |
km |
vehicle |
personal |
| oil consum.
(liters/ 100km) |
oil consum.
(liters) |
greenhouse gases*
(eq. CO2 g/km) |
greenhouse gases*
(eq. CO2 in tons) |
number of pass. ** |
oil consum. (liters) |
greenhouse gases*
(eq. CO2 in tons) |
cost *** (Euros) |
| car |
520,000 |
9.6 |
49,920 |
316 |
164 |
1.4 |
36,438 |
120.0 |
1,556 |
| plane |
333,500 |
1,100 |
3,668,500 |
65,545 |
21,860 |
285.0 |
12,872 |
76.7 |
1,458 |
| bicycle |
36,000 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
| train/subway |
25,000 |
nc |
nc |
nc |
nc |
nc |
nc |
0.3 |
6 |
| bus |
14,000 |
40.0 |
5,600 |
1,857 (pc) |
26 (pc) |
20.0 |
280 |
1.3 (pc) |
26 |
| walk |
9,000 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
| moppet |
1,500 |
4.0 |
60 |
100 |
0.15 |
1.5 |
40 |
0.1 |
2 |
| boat |
800 |
nc |
nc |
nc |
nc |
nc |
nc |
0.0006 |
0 |
| total |
939,800 |
. |
3,724,080 |
. |
22,050 |
|
49,630 |
198.4 |
3,773 |
Greenhouse gases* :
greenhouse
gases are calculated in « equivalent
CO2 », so this includes all other greenhouse gases
on top of
the CO2.
For
cars, the quantity of greenhouse gases includes
the emissions
linked to a car’s manufacture, the emissions linked to
fuel-refining + transport to petrol stations and the emissions linked
to fuel combustion in car’s engine. These emissions are about
50%
higher than emissions the manufacturer’s stated emissions. Sources
: Climat Mundi et ADEME.
For
planes, there is a factor of 3 between the real quantity
of CO2 emitted and its measure in "equivalent
CO2 ».
This comes also from the greater effects of the pollutants when emitted
at a high altitude. Sources
: Climat Mundi et ADEME.
Number of pass.** :
the number of passengers is an estimate, it takes into
account an average loading of 75% for the plane for example.
Cost*** :
cost to offset the amount of CO2 emitted, as calculated on Climat Mundi website for car and
planes, and extrapolated from there for other means
of transportation.
nc : not
communicated.
(pc) :
pending confirmation.
939,800 km in 32
years, this is equivalent to 80 return trips between Paris and New
York ; this is
also more than one return trip to the Moon !!
Nearly 50,000
liters of oil were burnt in smoke and I emitted an equivalent of 200
tons of CO2 in the atmosphere. No, there is really nothing to be proud
of ... no, no ...
But
what did I do wrong ? Nothing, absolutely nothing. I did not break any
law. Nowadays, polluting the environment is a right, and when listening
to some politicians, it even sounds like a national duty !!
Buy
cars, take the plane, spend your money, make this sluggish economy run
full steam, give us growth, more growth, always more growth …
Unfortunately, this is one
of the main limitation of our society and its development model,
where what is ethically irresponsible, can be totally legal. From there
to say that our current society has no value left, there is only a very
small step to make
…
|

|
To
measure your ecological
footprint, WWF Switzerland has developed a very
instructive little game !!
Do not hesitate, it takes less than 5 minutes. You're going to be
surprised ...
|
My commitments
When playing the game « who's
fault is that ?
» … without any doubt our generation will be in
the
spotlight one day or another. Because after all, previous generations
polluted little compared to what we do today, and they had
never
been given access to as much information as we do. Next generations,
this is a certainty, will have access to great information, however it
won't be possible anymore for them to pollute as much as we are doing,
mostly because fossil energy will be all used up for a long
time.
Our
generation is the generation who has come at the parting of the ways.
It is the generation who can make history tip over one side or another.
It is the generation on which lies the responsibility of the living
conditions of the entire Humanity for the next
millenniums … just this, only this but nothing less
than
this … so are you still considering going to the Seychelles
for
your honeymoon !?
As an individual, if I do not change my behavior,
I will travel another ~ 4 million kilometers before death comes, burning an additional 100,000 liters of oil and
emitting an equivalent of 400
tons of CO2 more (this is assuming an average
polluting efficiency improvement of 33% over the 2008-2055 period).
This would not be very responsible, would it ? …
So I decided to take a few steps in order to
become a better citizen of the planet :
- My
first step has consisted in limiting my air-travel, allowing myself
only one return trip from Bangkok to France per year, and so far I have
successfully respected this over the last 4 years.
- Second
step was to resign from my present work, located 65 km away for my
apartment and 10,000 km away from my family. Expatriation is an
aberration of our time, an ecological non-sense.
- Third step was to quit flying, just in the same
way as some quit smoking. My last flight will be
in June 2008.

|
I
have to admit that this will not require much efforts since flying has
become an increasingly unpleasant experience : endless queues
when
boarding, intrusive security measures, ridiculous space inside the
plane, and much worse ...
If you have decided as well to stop flying, you can register here and then get your non-flying certificate : see mine
here (this certificate takes into
consideration my flight of June
2008).
|
- Fourth step was to offer
a greenhouse-gas free year to the planet by cycling home, and inform a maximum
number of people on this project, notably through partnerships with participating schools.
- Fifth
and last step was to reset my carbon emission counter by paying for all my past
emissions (including but not limited to the 3,773 Euros calculated
above). If you wish to help me in becoming CO2 neutral,
click here !
And
my approach is not exceptional (besides, I am quite normal myself, my
friends would tell you) and I am not looking forward to an ascetic
life. The fact is that we can't proclaim ourselves homo sapiens (wise
man) and at the same time behave without thinking to the consequences
of our acts, letting to some supreme hypothetical superpower the duty
to legislate and regulate our lifestyle
...
Unfortunately,
we often hear saying that Westerners
-be
it true or not-
"accept
the reality of the global warming, think the environment is in danger
and are in favor of sustainable development …
HOWEVER, they
usually do not acknowledge their individual responsibility, and refuse
to follow a discipline which would impact their standard of
living".
But let's
not mix up lower standard of living and
lower quality of life. Those are two really different
concepts.
Prisoners of giant traffic jams or driving our children to see the
doctor for an asthma crisis caused by air pollution, we could ask
ourselves about how satisfying is our actual quality of life.
With sole direction growth and materialistic wealth, we let ourselves
being trapped by competition, stress and individualism, resulting in a
brutal and selfish society.
15 billion years of evolution have been necessary for us to discover
the origin of the universe, to understand how atoms and galaxies work,
to explore the solar system, to domesticate the nature, but we are
incapable of mobilizing our efforts to prevent our own extinction !
Here is in a few words the great tragedy we are facing today.
Let's act together for a
better world !
The little,
the very little we can do, we have to do it.
Théodore Monod.
We
must be the change we wish to see in the world.
Gandhi.