Rose des Vents

    Aventures Bicyclétales ...

Evolution
Travel towards the unknown, meet people, respect the Earth !!
 Home
Pollution from motor transportation !!  
 Why on a bicycle ?
 Becoming CO2 neutral
Pollution from motor transportation : we talk a lot about it, we can see it, we can hear it, we can smell it, we can cough it too … some go as far as vomiting it while some others die from it, but actually what is it !? .
pollution en ville



Pollution from motor transportation in general

Our transports generate several different types of pollution, which have multiple consequences on our environment and our quality of life. I have listed below the most critical aspects of it :
  • Air pollution of course, it’s the most obvious because it can be observed with your own eyes. Stinky air and respiratory diseases in towns, emission of greenhouse gases and global warming for the whole planet … with all the unpleasant consequences this will have for the future generations. For more information, click here.
  • Water pollution, with intentional and unintentional marine oil spills.
  • Noise pollution, especially for those lucky city dwellers who live right next to an airport.
  • Esthetic pollution, frankly, do you really enjoy the sight of a hundred cars waiting in front of a traffic light ? Or an highway  crossing right in the middle of  your garden ? ... I think we agree ...
  • Nervous pollution, with the unbearable stress of the traffic jams, the irritating behavior of some other motorists, the impossibility to get parked sometimes, the accidents, and so on ...
  • Space pollution,
    • In town, with the congestion of the heart of the city and the obligation to give away always more room for roads and car parks, all this at the expense of Humans living space ...
    • Upcountry, with the division of large natural habitats by highways and rail-lines, provoking the extinction of big mammals and therefore reducing the biodiversity.
  • Last type of « pollution », but not least, it's the one that consist in using and wasting a non renewable resource. It may come as a surprise to some, but no, given the pace at which we are consuming it, oil cannot be considered as a renewable energy. For more information, click here.

 



Air pollution from motor transportation and global warming

Air pollution from motor transportation comes at 80% from road vehicles (cars, motorbikes, scooters, trucks, bus) and at 20% from airplanes … (air pollution from trains and boats is not significant here). 

pedaleurs chinois                    dommage

Here are the major primary air pollutants produced by Human motor transportation :
.
  • Carbon dioxide (CO2) : this is the main greenhouse gas, responsible for 60% of the actual global warming.
  • Carbon monoxide (CO) : it is colorless, odorless, non-irritating but it is a very poisonous gas, it prevents blood from carrying oxygen in the body.
  • Nitrogen oxides (NOx) : especially nitrogen dioxide are emitted from high temperature combustion. Can be seen as the brown haze dome above or plume downwind of cities. It provokes respiratory diseases and increases body vulnerability to the microbes. It is responsible for about 6% of the actual global warming phenomenon.
  • Ground level ozone (O3) : formed by NOx and VOCs pollutants together with oxygen under the sun light. During particularly hot summers, its evacuation towards the higher layers of the atmosphere is slowed down, thus resulting in health hazard for the most vulnerable city dwellers. This dangerous ground level ozone is not the same ozone as the stratospheric ozone, usually called the ozone layer ; this latest ozone is a necessary vital filter of the UV light.
  • Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) : such as hydrocarbon fuel vapors and solvents, they are one of the two constituents necessary to generate ground level ozone. See above.
  • Particulate Matter (PM) : it is measured as smoke and dust. PM10 is the fraction of suspended particles 10 micrometers in diameter and smaller that will enter the nasal cavity. PM2.5 has a maximum particle size of 2.5 µm and will enter the bronchus and lungs. They are mostly produced by Diesel engines. They are responsible for multiple allergies, respiratory problems or even cancer in some cases.
  • Sulfur dioxide (SO2: this irritates the respiratory system and is as well responsible for acid rains.

Transports account for 20 to 30% of the greenhouse gases resulting from Human activity, and it is the only source which keeps rising out of control (other sources of human produced greenhouse gases, worldwide data : industry = 25%, housing / services = 22%, deforestation = 15%, agriculture = 13%)

Air traffic statistics speak for themselves : +30% over the last 4 years since 2002, 2.12 billions passengers in 2006 and forecasts suggesting +5%/year until 2026, with 29,000 additional aircrafts in the air (Source : Capital, No193, October 2007). On the long run, air transport (which conveniently is not part of the Kyoto protocol) will become the largest source of greenhouse gases in the world !

As for cars and trucks, there were 550 millions of those vehicles registered in 2005, and since a growth of 5%/year is anticipated for the next 25 years, we will reach over a billion cars in 2030 … help ...

 La planete flambe ...     Effets pervers du rechauffement climatique ...

At least if global warming was a problem that could be quickly controlled and solved once suitable actions would be taken, but unfortunately this does work this way. The main greenhouse gas responsible for global warming, the carbon dioxide (CO2), remains in the atmosphere for several hundred years, which means it will impact climate long after its emission peak ... a peak which has yet to come, and which several analysts do not expect anytime before the very end of the XXIst century ...

And that's not all (I really hope I'm not spoiling your day, but the situation is quite critical, and we need to talk about it). So that's not all, because once some climate phenomenon will be set in motion, we will not be able to stop them until they reach the end of it ... a very good example is the ice-cap melting on the poles. The concept is simple : greenhouse gases warm up the atmosphere and induce ice melting. But ice, because it's white, reflects a lot of sun light ; thus ice has a kind of "cooling effect" on the planet.  Greenhouse gases => global warming => more ice melting => less refraction of sun light => less ice "cooling effect" => global warming => more ice melting => global warming and so on ... until the point there will be no ice left on Earth and polar bears will have to swim to survive !!

But unfortunately, ice-melting and sea water rise from thermal expansion during the next millenniums (yes, at least this long) may not actually be the biggest threat Humanity will have to face ... currently we are being given a go for a time of extreme climate catastrophes (floods, storms, typhoons, etc ...) which will without doubt bring famine on a planet with 10 billions people to nourish (10 billions people is an optimistic forecast, supposed to be the maximum number of persons the planet will ever have to bear by 2050) ... and when I am saying "we", I am thinking about the next generation who will certainly blame us for not having been more clear sighted ... 



Oil depletion

In 2002, France spent 95 million tons of oil, out of which 50 millions were spent in transports ; this is more than half of the total consumption. The world burns (there is no better word) 4 billion tons of oil per year, and this number increases by 2% every year.

Oil and its derivatives (coil, natural gas, tar sands, etc …) originate from a very long sedimentation process over a period of several hundred million years. So theoretically, oil is a renewable resource ; however, practically it is not. By spending within 200 years what took 100 million years to be produced, we spend this resource 500,000 times faster than it can re-generate itself. So oil, with certainty, will be depleted.

Specialists predict the oil production peak will occur between 2010 (geologist opinion) and 2035 (economist opinion). The actual proven and possible oil reserves in the world should be sufficient for another 30 years … however the real troubles will happen much sooner, and as soon as production will not be able to grow as fast as the demand. Of course, when this happens, any "hiccup" (war in a major producing country, strike, sabotage, downgrading of the reserves of a major operator, etc) will generate a surge in the oil price, going from anything from a little price increase to a major oil shock, equivalent to that of 1979 or even greater ... This would not be the first war which purpose is to secure resources a country does not have at home. Remember those two numbers : 80% of the oil is located in countries spending only 20% of it (Persian Gulf) … and 20% of the oil is located in countries spending 80% of it (Western countries and Asia).


petrole                         avion     

And the solution will not come from biofuels, since given their poor productivity and the limited surface available for cultivation, we (in France) could produce biofuels only for 40% of our cars … assuming we would not grow any food at all !!! This is not likely to be the future … 

Electric cars and Hydrogen cars (fuel cell) are also false good ideas, because those energies are not primary energies but need to be produced from another energy source. In today's world, electricity and hydrogen are mainly produced from fossil energy, except in France, where nuclear energy generates 78% of the electricity. OK, so let's imagine that we (in France) all go for electric cars, we will then have to double our nuclear energy capacity and is it necessary to recall that Uranium 235 reserves (only nuclear fuel right now) are evaluated at 50 to 90 years at most ? We see it clearly, there will be no miracle the science only can handle, consumers behaviors will have to change. We will have to change.





My personal impact

Out of pure curiosity, and certainly not to give in any self-flagellation tendency (does this make sense in English ? I really wonder !!), I wanted to know how many tons of oil I had spent in my entire life, and how many tons of greenhouse gases was I responsible for so far ? So I took my calculator and got started with additions and multiplications ... here are the results :

means of transportation km vehicle personal
oil consum. (liters/ 100km) oil consum.  (liters) greenhouse gases* (eq. CO2 g/km) greenhouse gases* (eq. CO2 in tons) number of pass. ** oil consum. (liters) greenhouse gases* (eq. CO2 in tons) cost *** (Euros)
car 520,000 9.6 49,920 316 164 1.4 36,438 120.0 1,556
plane 333,500 1,100 3,668,500 65,545 21,860 285.0 12,872 76.7 1,458
bicycle 36,000 0.0 0 0 0 1.0 0 0.0 0.00
train/subway 25,000 nc nc nc nc nc nc 0.3 6
bus 14,000 40.0 5,600 1,857 (pc) 26 (pc) 20.0 280 1.3 (pc) 26
walk 9,000 0.0 0 0 0 1.0 0 0.0 0.00
moppet 1,500 4.0 60 100 0.15 1.5 40 0.1 2
boat 800 nc nc nc nc nc nc 0.0006 0
total 939,800 . 3,724,080 . 22,050 49,630 198.4 3,773

Greenhouse gases* :
greenhouse gases are calculated in « equivalent CO2 », so this includes all other greenhouse gases on top of the CO2.
For cars, the  quantity of greenhouse gases includes the emissions linked to a car’s manufacture, the emissions linked to fuel-refining + transport to petrol stations and the emissions linked to fuel combustion in car’s engine. These emissions are about 50% higher than emissions the manufacturer’s stated emissions. Sources : Climat Mundi et ADEME.
For planes, there is a factor of 3 between the real quantity of CO2 emitted and its measure in "equivalent CO2 ». This comes also from the greater effects of the pollutants when emitted at a high altitude. Sources : Climat Mundi et ADEME.
Number of pass.** : the number of passengers is an estimate, it takes into account an average loading of 75% for the plane for example.
Cost*** : cost to offset the amount of CO2 emitted, as calculated on
Climat Mundi website for car and planes, and extrapolated from there for other means of transportation.
nc : not communicated.
(pc) : pending confirmation.


939,800 km in 32 years, this is equivalent to 80 return trips between Paris and New York ; this is also more than one return trip to the Moon !! Nearly 50,000 liters of oil were burnt in smoke and I emitted an equivalent of 200 tons of CO2 in the atmosphere. No, there is really nothing to be proud of ... no, no ... 

But what did I do wrong ? Nothing, absolutely nothing. I did not break any law. Nowadays, polluting the environment is a right, and when listening to some politicians, it even sounds like a national duty !! Buy cars, take the plane, spend your money, make this sluggish economy run full steam, give us growth, more growth, always more growth …

Unfortunately, this is one of the main limitation of our society and its development model, where what is ethically irresponsible, can be totally legal. From there to say that our current society has no value left, there is only a very small step to make …

wwf

To measure your ecological footprint, WWF Switzerland has developed a very instructive little game !! Do not hesitate, it takes less than 5 minutes. You're going to be surprised ...





My commitments


When playing the game « who's fault is that ? » … without any doubt our generation will be in the spotlight one day or another. Because after all, previous generations polluted little compared to what we do today, and they had never been given access to as much information as we do. Next generations, this is a certainty, will have access to great information, however it won't be possible anymore for them to pollute as much as we are doing, mostly because fossil energy will be all used up for a long time. 

Our generation is the generation who has come at the parting of the ways. It is the generation who can make history tip over one side or another. It is the generation on which lies the responsibility of the living conditions of the entire Humanity for the next millenniums … just this, only this but nothing less than this … so are you still considering going to the Seychelles for your honeymoon !?

As an individual, if I do not change my behavior, I will travel another ~ 4 million kilometers before death comes, burning an additional 100,000 liters of oil and emitting an equivalent of 400 tons of CO2 more (this is assuming  an average polluting efficiency improvement of 33% over the 2008-2055 period). This would not be very responsible, would it ? …

So I decided to take a few steps in order to become a better citizen of the planet :

  • My first step has consisted in limiting my air-travel, allowing myself only one return trip from Bangkok to France per year, and so far I have successfully respected this over the last 4 years.
  • Second step was to resign from my present work, located 65 km away for my apartment and 10,000 km away from my family. Expatriation is an aberration of our time, an ecological non-sense.
  • Third step was to quit flying, just in the same way as some quit smoking. My last flight will be in June 2008. 
    no plane
    I have to admit that this will not require much efforts since flying has become an increasingly unpleasant experience : endless queues when boarding, intrusive security measures, ridiculous space inside the plane, and much worse ...
    If you have decided as well to stop flying, you can register here and then get your non-flying certificate : see mine here (this certificate takes into consideration my flight of June 2008).
  • Fourth step was to offer a greenhouse-gas free year to the planet by cycling home, and inform a maximum number of people on this project, notably through partnerships with participating schools.
  • Fifth and last step was to reset my carbon emission counter by paying for all my past emissions (including but not limited to the 3,773 Euros calculated above). If you wish to help me in becoming CO2 neutral, click here !
And my approach is not exceptional (besides, I am quite normal myself, my friends would tell you) and I am not looking forward to an ascetic life. The fact is that we can't proclaim ourselves homo sapiens (wise man) and at the same time behave without thinking to the consequences of our acts, letting to some supreme hypothetical superpower the duty to legislate and regulate our lifestyle ... 

Unfortunately, we often hear saying that Westerners -be it true or not- "accept the reality of the global warming, think the environment is in danger and are in favor of sustainable development … HOWEVER, they usually do not acknowledge their individual responsibility, and refuse to follow a discipline which would impact their standard of living". 

But let's not mix up lower standard of living and lower quality of life. Those are two really different concepts. Prisoners of giant traffic jams or driving our children to see the doctor for an asthma crisis caused by air pollution, we could ask ourselves about how satisfying is our actual quality of life. With sole direction growth and materialistic wealth, we let ourselves being trapped by competition, stress and individualism, resulting in a brutal and selfish society.

15 billion years of evolution have been necessary for us to discover the origin of the universe, to understand how atoms and galaxies work, to explore the solar system, to domesticate the nature, but we are incapable of mobilizing our efforts to prevent our own extinction ! Here is in a few words the great tragedy we are facing today.

Let's act together for a better world !


The little, the very little we can do, we have to do it.
Théodore Monod.

We must be the change we wish to see in the world.
Gandhi.  


Pour un monde avec plus de fleurs que de fumees ...


Sources : Manicore / Climat Mundi / ADEME / Wikipédia / Own research.
Links on this topic.
Bibliography on this topic.


.
All rights reserved : Copyrights © 2007 Frédéric LINGET